A practical legal guide by Advocate Anant Mishra · AM Legal, Delhi · Updated 2026
A mutual consent divorce petition filed under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955 can be withdrawn by either spouse at any time before the second motion hearing. The withdrawing party must file a written application before the concerned Family Court in Delhi expressing the withdrawal of consent. Once either party withdraws consent before the second motion, the court cannot grant a mutual consent divorce — the petition effectively stands dismissed.
Imagine this scenario: you and your spouse filed a mutual consent divorce petition at a Delhi Family Court after months of disagreement. The six-month statutory cooling period has been running. Now — midway through — you have had a change of heart. Perhaps genuine reconciliation efforts are underway, or perhaps your circumstances have shifted entirely. You want to know: can you legally pull back from this process, and exactly how do you do it?
The answer is yes — Indian matrimonial law deliberately preserves each spouse's right to withdraw consent right up to the moment the second motion is decided. This guide explains the full process specifically as it applies in Delhi's Family Courts in 2026, so you understand your rights, the correct procedure, and the practical implications before you take any step.
Considering withdrawing your divorce petition? Speaking with a matrimonial lawyer before filing any application protects your legal position. AM Legal advises clients across Delhi's Family Courts on exactly these situations.
Book a Consultation with AM Legal Visit AM Legal's WebsiteA mutual consent divorce in India is governed by Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for Hindus, Buddhists, Jains, and Sikhs), Section 28 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 (for inter-faith or civil marriages), and equivalent provisions under other personal law statutes. This guide focuses primarily on Section 13B, which is the most commonly invoked provision in Delhi Family Courts.
Section 13B operates through a deliberate two-stage process, each stage being a separate court appearance called a "motion":
Yes — and this right is well-established in Indian law. The landmark Supreme Court ruling in Sureshta Devi v. Om Prakash (1991) 2 SCC 25 is the foundational authority on this point. The Supreme Court held that in a mutual consent divorce, consent must continue to exist right up to the point the decree is passed. Either spouse can withdraw consent at any time before the second motion is moved or decided. Consent given at the first motion stage is not irrevocable.
This principle has significant practical consequences. If one spouse files an application withdrawing consent — even the day before the scheduled second motion hearing — the court cannot proceed to grant a divorce decree under Section 13B. The mutual element is destroyed, and the petition must be dismissed. The other spouse's only recourse at that point is to file a contested divorce petition under a separate ground (such as cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia), or desertion, etc.) — a different and longer process.
Either spouse can unilaterally withdraw consent. The withdrawal does not require the agreement of the other spouse. If both spouses together wish to withdraw the petition (for example, they have fully reconciled), they can jointly file a withdrawal application, which the court will accept without any contest.
Any interim settlement agreements, consent orders on maintenance, or child custody arrangements recorded during the first motion proceedings do not automatically dissolve when the petition is withdrawn. If those arrangements were passed as interim orders by the court, they remain operative until varied by a fresh court order. If they were merely contractual agreements between the parties (not made court orders), their enforceability depends on the specific terms agreed. This is why legal advice before withdrawal is important — withdrawing the divorce petition does not necessarily undo every prior commitment made during the process.
The procedural framework for withdrawing a divorce petition in Delhi Family Courts is drawn from Order XXIII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) read with the principle from Sureshta Devi that consent must subsist till the decree. The CPC has not been replaced by the 2023-24 recodification (BNS/BNSS/BSA) — those Acts replaced only criminal statutes, not civil procedure law, so Order XXIII CPC remains fully operative.
| Document | Details / Notes | Mandatory? |
|---|---|---|
| Withdrawal Application | Plain-paper application addressed to the Family Court judge; clearly states intent to withdraw consent and references the case number | Yes |
| Supporting Affidavit | Sworn on ₹100 non-judicial stamp paper; affirms voluntary withdrawal, free from coercion | Yes (standard practice) |
| Court Fee Stamp | Nominal amount (₹5–₹50); to be affixed on the application as per the specific court's practice | Yes |
| Copy of Original Petition | Copy of the Section 13B(1) petition already on record — useful to reference case particulars in the application | Advisable |
| Proof of Identity | Aadhar card / PAN card / passport of the withdrawing party for court verification | Carry to hearing |
| Vakalatnama (if represented by advocate) | Authorization letter appointing your lawyer to appear; required if filing through legal representation | If using a lawyer |
The withdrawal application must be filed before the same Family Court where the original mutual consent divorce petition was admitted and the first motion was recorded. You cannot file it in a different court. Delhi has multiple Family Courts, each having territorial jurisdiction based on the location of the last matrimonial home or the place of marriage or where the parties reside.
The principal Family Court establishments in Delhi as of 2026 include:
AM Legal, based in Hudson Lane, GTB Nagar, Delhi 110009, regularly appears before Family Courts across Delhi, including Tis Hazari and Rohini. If you are unsure which court has your case, check the case number on your original petition — it will carry a court code identifying the specific bench. Consulting an experienced Delhi divorce lawyer ensures the application is filed before the correct bench without delay.
The cooling period divorce rule under Section 13B(2) is central to understanding your window for withdrawal. The legislature intentionally built this six-to-eighteen-month period into the law as a safeguard — specifically so that spouses do not make irrevocable decisions impulsively. The cooling period is, in essence, an institutionalised opportunity for reflection and reconciliation.
As a practical matter, a spouse wishing to withdraw a mutual consent divorce petition can do so at any point from the day after the first motion until just before the second motion is concluded. The most legally straightforward time to withdraw is during the cooling period itself — before any second motion date has been set. Filing during this window gives both parties maximum clarity and avoids any argument about whether withdrawal was timely.
Even after a second motion date has been set by the court, withdrawal remains legally valid — provided the decree has not actually been passed. If you discover on the morning of your second motion hearing that you wish to withdraw, you can file an urgent application before the proceedings begin, or inform your lawyer to raise it as the very first matter before the judge. Courts in Delhi have consistently accepted such applications, because the principle from Sureshta Devi is clear: consent must be present when the decree is passed, not merely when the petition was filed.
If the Family Court waived the cooling period under the Amardeep Singh principle and listed the second motion early, the withdrawal right still exists — the waiver of the cooling period does not remove either party's right to withdraw consent. It simply compresses the timeline. A spouse who changes their mind must act quickly and file the withdrawal application before the second motion hearing.
When a couple decides not to proceed with the mutual consent divorce, they essentially have two routes: actively filing a withdrawal application, or passively allowing the petition to lapse by not filing the second motion within 18 months. The table below compares these two approaches.
| Factor | Active Withdrawal (Filing Application) | Passive Lapse (Not Filing Second Motion) |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | Immediate — court dismisses on the next hearing date | Takes up to 18 months from first motion date |
| Legal Clarity | High — a court order on record confirms dismissal | Moderate — lapse is statutory but may require confirmation |
| Court Record | Dismissal order issued; certified copy available | No formal order; petition simply treated as abated |
| Risk of Dispute | Low — withdrawal is unambiguous | Possible confusion if one party argues second motion was filed |
| Cost | Minimal (nominal court fee + lawyer's application charges) | No direct cost, but legal limbo for up to 18 months |
| Best Suited For | Genuine reconciliation; urgent clarity needed | Uncertain situations; parties still deciding |
For most Delhi couples who have genuinely reconciled, the active withdrawal route is strongly preferable. It produces a court order closing the matter cleanly, which is useful for any future legal proceedings, housing applications, or official records that touch on marital status.
Once the Family Court records the withdrawal and dismisses the mutual consent divorce petition, the marriage continues in law. The parties remain legally married with all rights and obligations that flow from marriage under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, and other applicable statutes.
Several important legal consequences follow:
No — the other spouse cannot legally prevent one party from withdrawing consent in a mutual consent divorce. The entire foundation of Section 13B is mutual consent. The moment one party withdraws, the mutuality is gone, and the court cannot grant the decree. This is a personal right of each spouse and cannot be overridden by the other party's objections or by any contractual agreement.
Some spouses attempt to argue that a settlement agreement or an MOU signed alongside the first motion legally binds the other party to proceed with the divorce. Indian courts have consistently rejected this argument. A contractual obligation cannot compel a spouse to maintain consent to dissolution of a marriage — such an agreement would be against public policy and void to that extent. The Supreme Court's reasoning in Sureshta Devi explicitly accounts for this: consent to divorce must be free and subsisting at the time of the decree, and no prior agreement can remove the right to withdraw.
Where the other spouse feels aggrieved by the withdrawal — for example, if they believe the withdrawal is an abuse of process or an attempt to extract more favourable terms — their remedy is to file a separate contested divorce petition on independently established matrimonial grounds before the appropriate Delhi Family Court.
The discussion above focuses on Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act. However, Delhi Family Courts also handle matrimonial matters under other personal law frameworks. The withdrawal right operates similarly but under different statutory provisions:
Section 28 of the Special Marriage Act is the equivalent of Section 13B for couples married under civil law. The same two-motion structure applies, with the same six-to-eighteen-month cooling period. The principle from Sureshta Devi applies equally — either party can withdraw consent before the second motion. The withdrawal procedure before a Delhi Family Court is identical to that described above.
Muslim law provides for Khula (wife-initiated dissolution) and Mubarat (mutual divorce by agreement). These do not follow the court-petition, two-motion structure of the Hindu Marriage Act or Special Marriage Act. However, where a Muslim couple files a petition before a Delhi court under the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939, withdrawal of such a petition follows general CPC Order XXIII principles.
The Divorce Act, 1869 (as amended) applies to Christians. It does not have a provision precisely mirroring Section 13B, but mutual consent divorce for Christians has been made available through Section 10A of the Divorce Act. Withdrawal rights and procedures follow similar principles — either party can withdraw before a final decree.
Experience from matrimonial practice at Delhi Family Courts — including the work handled at AM Legal — reveals a set of recurring errors that parties make when attempting to withdraw a divorce petition. Being aware of these helps you avoid unnecessary delays or complications.
Matrimonial proceedings — even when they begin as mutual consent divorces — often involve deeply personal and legally complex decisions. A change of mind mid-process is far more common than people realise, and it carries legal consequences that deserve careful handling.
Advocate Anant Mishra practises matrimonial law at AM Legal, located at Hudson Lane, GTB Nagar, Delhi 110009. The firm advises clients on the full range of matrimonial matters before Delhi Family Courts — including contested divorces, mutual consent divorces, maintenance disputes, child custody, and the specific procedural steps involved when a client wishes to withdraw a mutual consent divorce petition.
Guidance from AM Legal in such situations typically covers: reviewing the stage of proceedings and confirming the withdrawal window is still open, drafting the withdrawal application and supporting affidavit, advising on the legal status of any interim orders or settlement agreements already in place, appearing before the Family Court for the withdrawal hearing, and advising on next steps — whether that means assisting with reconciliation-related legal matters or, if reconciliation does not hold, helping the client understand the options for a contested or fresh mutual divorce petition in the future.
For location-specific guidance, AM Legal also advises clients whose matrimonial matters are listed before courts in different parts of Delhi, including Rohini, Dwarka, Tis Hazari, and Saket Family Courts.
Have a question about your mutual consent divorce petition or the withdrawal process? Reach out to AM Legal directly — Advocate Anant Mishra and the team are available to guide you through the process with clarity and care.
WhatsApp AM Legal Now Book a Formal Consultation